|
|
| |
|
How to use IBPindex ? |
| |
|
Does IBPindex works ? |
| |
|
Why there are difference in a same route? |
| |
|
Why subjective factors aren’t taken account in the
calculation? |
| |
|
Which mistake margin have IBPindex? |
| |
|
Who can use IBP index ? |
| |
|
Why don’t coincide the accumulated meters with my
information? |
| |
|
What isn’t IBPindex? |
| |
| |
| |
How
to use IBPindex ?
Analyze the routes you make very often, those you know best and compare
the results with the routes you know less. That will make you a personal
scale that will be useful for you to know the difficulty of other routes
without having done them before. |
| |
 |
| |
Does
IBPindex works ?
The response is in your hand. Analyze some routes you have done recently
and compare the results with your expectations. Are they the same? |
| |
 |
| |
Why
there are difference in a same route?
A route recorded with different gps won’t give the same results because,
obviously, the information in the gps won’t be the same and they won’t
have crossed the same route. So, the mistake margins and their
calibration won’t be the same neither.
|
When exporting the track from a format to
another one, there are some variations that make little
deviations in the result. |
|
| |
 |
| |
Why
subjective factors aren’t taken account in the calculation?
Because subjective factors like climatology, physic state or the pace of
the career are different in each route. That makes IBPs different in
each repetition of the same route and it won’t be useful to compare. The
state of the area is completely different. See the article in the page
of description. |
| |
 |
| |
Which
mistake margin have IBPindex?
The reliability of the result of IBP index will be as high as real is
the information analyzed. If information comes from a track drawn
manually, the possibility that there are mistakes is very high. (See –advice-) |
| |
 |
| |
Who
can use IBPindex ?
Anybody can use IBP index, from a fan that has just started to a
competition professional. In mountain bike or in road bike. |
| |
 |
| |
|
Why don’t coincide the accumulated meters with my information? |
|
The total accumulated meters of raise and descent that IBPindex shows
is strictly the sum of the GPS records. GPS receptors tend to
accumulate some meters more of raise and descent due to sway.
The modernest receptors are, day after day , more precise and so they
accumulate fewer mistake.
Some programs (including intern programs which manage the devices) make
a correction of this mistake by eliminating the accumulated meters, If
some longitudinal meters ( 5m usually) are not crossed. We think that
this correction can also falsify the reality. If we imagine a plane
path with continuous unevenness of 0.5m ( a very usual fact in MTB) the
correction will give us 0 accumulated meters although we have surely
raised many of them.
In IBPindex we don’t make any correction, as we don’t know if
information comes from a receptor with a big or little mistake, a wavy
or a plane path..., we think that information given from the GPS will be
more exact day after day. |
| |
What
isn’t IBPindex?
IBP index won’t tell you how hard will be the next route or how much you
suffered in the last route. If you want to know that, apply next
formula: |
| |
| Climatologic conditions (rain,mud, etc..) |
+ |
physic state |
+ |
race pace |
+ |
IBP |
= |
route
hardness |
|
| |
 |
| |
| |